Colorado repealed its AI Act — the ADMT law that replaced it starts January 1, 2027See what changed →
🏛️ State, local & federal government

Public bodies are held to the higher standard. Fair enough.

Residents didn't opt in to being governed by an algorithm, which is why the questions arrive faster here and the answers have to be public. An inventory, a policy anyone can read, and dated records of who decided what.

Built for a department without an AI risk team — which is most of them.

The chrome lion arriving in a government office, the Capitol dome visible through the window
What we hear

Three things showing up on the agenda

“A council member asked what AI we use.”

The inventory is the answer, and it's a page you can hand over rather than a project you have to start.

“We got a records request about an automated decision.”

The impact assessment and the decision record already exist, dated, with a named owner on each.

“Procurement wants an AI clause and nobody has one.”

Generate the vendor AI risk assessment and the acceptable-use standard, then attach them to the solicitation.

Every level of government

Not just federal

Most AI governance software is written for a federal CIO with a program office. The tier that actually needs this is the one with a single IT generalist and a council meeting on Tuesday.

State agencies

Statewide AI directives and procurement rules are arriving faster than staffing for them. The inventory and the crosswalk are what an oversight committee actually asks to see.

Cities, counties and districts

A council meeting, a public-records request, and one IT generalist. This is the tier the enterprise vendors skip entirely, and the one this product was shaped around.

Federal agencies and contractors

OMB M-25-21 and M-25-22 compliance plans, generated against the same cited control library as everything else. Agency plan.

Why it’s different here

Four things a private company doesn’t have to worry about

It will be read in public

Your AI policy is a public document the day it's approved. Plain language stops being a nicety when a reporter, a resident, and a council member all read the same page.

Records requests don't wait

Dated records of what was decided, by whom, and when — already assembled, rather than reconstructed under a statutory clock.

Consequential decisions are the job

Benefits, licensing, permits, enforcement, school placement. Nearly everything a public body decides is the category the new state AI laws are written about.

It's taxpayer money

Cost tracking per tool with renewal alerts, so an AI subscription is a budget line somebody approved rather than a surprise on a P-card.

What this is not

GOVERNBOX.ai is a governance program of record and a document generator. It is not an ATO’d or FedRAMP-authorized system, and nothing it produces is legal advice. It gives you a defensible, cited starting point that your own people review and approve — which is the part most agencies are missing, but it is not a compliance guarantee, and anybody selling you one of those is selling you something else.

See where your agency stands

Ten minutes, free, and no procurement process required to find out.

Take the free scorecard →